With the dust barely settled on the launch of the GoPro Lit Hero, DJI has responded with the unveiling of the Osmo Nano, intensifying the competition in the compact action camera space. Both companies appear to be targeting creators and everyday users seeking lightweight, highly portable video tools with professional-level features.
GoPro’s new Lit Hero was announced earlier this month, introducing a bright built-in light and upgraded performance features aimed at vloggers and social media content creators. As covered in Camera Jabber’s launch story, the Lit Hero builds on the form factor of its small predecessor, the GoPro Hero 2024, but adds a front-facing display, improved audio pickup, and integrated lighting that eliminates the need for separate accessories.
DJI’s Osmo Nano, meanwhile, was launched as a direct response to GoPro’s latest model. DJI’s announcement points to a similarly compact camera, featuring dual screens, improved low-light performance, and real-time wireless sharing for vertical video—a clear nod to the TikTok and Instagram generation. In terms of heritage, it appears to take forward many of the core ideas seen in DJI’s earlier model, the Action 2, especially its modularity and form factor.
While the Lit Hero focuses on simplicity and lighting integration, the Osmo Nano leans into smart shooting modes and sharing functionality. With pricing and availability confirmed for both models, this latest move sets the stage for a competitive season between two long-time rivals, each aiming to be the go-to choice for pocket-sized video capture.
As the two cameras land in the hands of reviewers and creators, comparisons will inevitably focus on practical usability, battery life, image quality, and how each model serves mobile-first content workflows.
The Specification Break down: GoPro Lit Hero Vs DJI OSMO Nano
| Specification | GoPro Lit Hero | DJI Osmo Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Camera Sensor | 1/1.9-inch CMOS | 1/1.7-inch CMOS |
| Video Resolution | 5.3K at 30fps / 4K at 60fps | 4K at 60fps |
| Stabilisation | HyperSmooth 6.0 | RockSteady 3.0 |
| Front Display | Yes (with built-in light) | Yes (dual screen) |
| Built-in Light | Yes (integrated front LED) | No (external accessory required) |
| Audio | Directional mic with wind reduction | Enhanced audio pickup with noise reduction |
| Battery Life | Up to 120 mins (1080p) | Up to 160 mins (1080p) |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C |
| Waterproofing | Up to 10m (no case) | Up to 10m (no case) |
| Weight | 135g | 120g |
| Storage | microSD (up to 1TB) | microSD (up to 512GB) |
| App Integration | Quik App | DJI Mimo App |
| Price | £329 / $299 | £299 / $279 |
| Release Date | September 2025 | September 2025 |
Size, Design, and Portability
In terms of physical build, both the GoPro Lit Hero and DJI Osmo Nano are compact action cameras designed for creators who need lightweight gear with solid durability. The Lit Hero weighs in at around 135g, while the Osmo Nano is slightly lighter at 120g. That small weight difference may be negligible in the hand but could matter in head-mounted or drone setups where balance and fatigue are factors.
The GoPro Lit Hero carries forward the same compact, rectangular design language seen in the GoPro Hero 2024, as reviewed here on Camera Jabber: GoPro Hero 2024 Review. However, the Lit Hero adds a front-facing LED light, which introduces a slight bulge to the front face of the camera.
DJI, meanwhile, has pursued a more modular approach with the Osmo Nano, following the spirit of the DJI Action 2. The Nano features a detachable screen module that can be mounted in different orientations or removed entirely for space-saving setups. This makes it more adaptable for dynamic shooting angles or self-filming situations. The design is also particularly appealing for travel and creators who work in tighter setups, where gear needs to be reconfigured quickly.
Both cameras offer waterproofing up to 10 metres without the need for an additional case, placing them on equal footing for water-based shooting, be it paddleboarding, snorkelling or wet-weather vlogging.
Display and User Interface
A key difference between the two models lies in their screen systems. The GoPro Lit Hero features a fixed front-facing screen paired with a rear display. This configuration is simple and effective, giving creators the ability to monitor framing and exposure whether they’re behind or in front of the camera. It closely resembles the setup in GoPro’s previous compact model, as explored in the GoPro Hero 2024 review.
The Osmo Nano, however, takes inspiration from the DJI Action 2’s modular design and introduces a detachable touchscreen module. This allows users to reposition or invert the screen based on their shooting needs. It can be flipped to face forward for vlogging, angled upwards for low-angle filming, or used remotely with a wireless connection. DJI appears to be targeting creators who prefer more granular control over their camera setup, and those who value portability without sacrificing versatility.
While the fixed screen of the GoPro may be quicker to operate out of the box, DJI’s dual-screen modular approach offers more customisation and could be better suited to more experimental or professional use cases.
Lighting and Low-Light Use
One of the most talked-about features of the GoPro Lit Hero is its integrated LED light, which positions it as the first action camera from GoPro with built-in illumination. This was a major focus of the official launch announcement covered on Camera Jabber: GoPro Lit Hero Price, Specifications and Availability Announced. The light is designed for fill use in low-light environments and provides direct lighting for self-filming, interviews, or handheld footage shot in dark locations.
The DJI Osmo Nano does not feature built-in lighting, but its larger 1/1.7-inch sensor (compared to the GoPro’s 1/1.9-inch sensor) offers marginally improved native low-light performance. This may result in less image noise and better exposure control in dim environments, but without an integrated light, users will need external lighting solutions for best results.
In practical terms, the Lit Hero is likely to appeal to users who work in unpredictable lighting conditions and want an all-in-one solution. The Nano, by contrast, will require a bit more planning and gear, but may offer stronger results when light levels are manageable.
Image and Video Quality
Video specifications are quite evenly matched between the two models, though there are some nuanced differences. The GoPro Lit Hero supports 5.3K recording at 30fps and 4K at 60fps. DJI’s Osmo Nano records at 4K 60fps, with no 5K mode listed at launch. As mentioned in the DJI Osmo Nano launch article, DJI is placing more emphasis on real-time processing and sharing features than sheer resolution.
In terms of stabilisation, the Lit Hero uses GoPro’s latest HyperSmooth 6.0, while the Osmo Nano uses RockSteady 3.0. Both systems are digital and have been praised in their earlier forms—HyperSmooth for fluid motion and RockSteady for precise correction. The differences between them often come down to personal preference: GoPro typically offers smoother transitions during dynamic shots, while DJI’s stabilisation tends to feel tighter and slightly more responsive in fast-paced action.
For stills, both cameras can capture high-resolution JPEGs, though neither is aimed at replacing traditional photography gear. The Osmo Nano’s larger sensor could give it a slight edge in dynamic range, but in practical terms, image quality will be closely matched in well-lit settings.
Battery Life and Charging
Battery life is another area where the DJI Osmo Nano slightly edges ahead. DJI quotes a maximum recording time of 160 minutes at 1080p, while GoPro lists 120 minutes under similar conditions. Actual performance will vary depending on features used (e.g., screen brightness, stabilisation, and Wi-Fi), but DJI appears to have prioritised endurance in this release.
Both devices charge via USB-C and support fast charging. Neither camera has a removable battery, which may be a drawback for professionals or long-form shooters, as it limits runtime to a single internal cell. For short-form content or casual use, however, both should perform more than adequately.
DJI’s move away from magnetic module batteries, as seen in the Action 2, appears to reflect a desire for a more streamlined device, while GoPro’s internal battery design follows its current ecosystem of compact, sealed cameras.
Connectivity and App Integration
Both the GoPro Lit Hero and DJI Osmo Nano support Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and USB-C connectivity, enabling mobile app control, file transfers, and firmware updates.
The GoPro is tightly integrated with the Quik app, which continues to offer automated video editing, cloud backups, and media organisation. For those already invested in GoPro’s subscription ecosystem, the app offers a seamless post-shoot workflow. These features are highlighted again in the GoPro Lit Hero launch article.
DJI’s Osmo Nano uses the Mimo app, which is known for its creative shooting modes and real-time sharing capabilities. DJI has clearly targeted vertical content creators, including options for instant upload to TikTok, Instagram, and other short-form platforms. The DJI Osmo Nano announcement puts significant emphasis on these features.
Ultimately, the choice may come down to which app and ecosystem a user is already comfortable with. GoPro users may prefer the streamlined editing and cloud features in Quik, while DJI’s Mimo offers more control during capture and stronger tools for mobile-first content delivery.
Target Audience: Beginner, Enthusiast, or Pro?
The GoPro Lit Hero is clearly aimed at beginners and casual content creators. Its built-in light, simplified interface, and fixed screen make it ideal for users who want to film quickly without additional gear. Its layout and operation are familiar, especially to those who have used previous models like the GoPro Hero 2024.
The DJI Osmo Nano is better suited to enthusiasts or more advanced creators who want greater control and flexibility. The modular screen design offers advantages in framing and portability, and the overall system has more options for customisation.
Professionals may find limitations in both due to the absence of swappable batteries and the compact sensor size. However, as secondary cameras or tools for capturing B-roll, social media edits, or behind-the-scenes content, both devices offer genuine utility.
Online Reception and Community Response
Community response to both launches has been swift. The GoPro Lit Hero’s integrated lighting feature has been widely welcomed as a practical evolution in compact camera design, particularly among travel vloggers, night shooters, and solo creators. The initial news coverage reflects a strong early interest in this unique addition.
DJI’s Osmo Nano, meanwhile, has been praised for its innovation and design flexibility. The Osmo Nano announcement article highlights the shift away from the magnetic module design of the Action 2 toward a more robust and adaptable screen system. Some users have raised concerns about the durability of the removable screen, especially in rugged or high-impact environments.
In online discussions, users appear to be weighing two questions: Is the GoPro Lit Hero’s simplicity and built-in lighting more valuable than the Osmo Nano’s modularity and battery life? And does either offer a meaningful upgrade over recent smartphones?
Verdict GoPro Lit Hero Vs DJI OSMO Nano
Both cameras offer strong, albeit different, value propositions.
The GoPro Lit Hero stands out for its ease of use, integrated lighting, and slightly higher maximum video resolution. It’s ideal for those who want a reliable, compact camera that can perform well without external accessories.
The DJI Osmo Nano appeals to creators who want more control over their setup and value features like a larger sensor, longer battery life, and the flexibility of a detachable screen. It carries forward many of the best ideas from the DJI Action 2 while refining them into a more user-friendly form.
Ultimately, the choice depends on the user’s workflow and shooting style. Both are credible options in the increasingly competitive compact camera space—and each seems designed to appeal to a different type of creator.
Leave a Reply